A COMPARATIVE STUDY ON THE RESPONSES OF TWO LINES OF SUGAR BEET (Beta vulgaris L) TO SALINITY
Sugar beet is a crop able to resist high levels of soil salinity after emergence and establishment. Considering the significant difference in the effect of nitrogen forms on sugar beet performance under normal conditions, the form of nitrogen may affect the performance of sugar beet plants under abiotic stress, particularly salinity. Additionally, exploring the most appropriate type of nitrogen for sugar beet could mean optimizing sucrose content. Therefore, here using two lines, sugar beet was grown in pots (filled with 4 kg soil), salt-resistance (line 7233- p.29 x Mst), and salt-sensitive (line 3929-21939), the effect of two different forms of nitrate in the form of calcium nitrate (1 g per pot) and ammonium in the form of ammonium sulfate (1 g per pot) under normal and salt stress condition (40 Millimoles per liter sodium chloride) were evaluated. The result revealed the positive influence of nitrate over ammonium by indicating higher dry weight in both sensitive line: 19.2 and 13.6 g, and tolerance line: 20.4 and 13.6 g, respectively alone and in combination with salinity stress. Similarly, root yield levels positively influenced by nitrate treatment either alone or under salinity stress (sensitive line: 194.5 and 243.2 g and tolerance line: 207 and 249.5 g). The outcomes additionally showed the accumulation of proline aerial parts in both lines, and however, the proline accumulation of sensitive line was higher (3.9 mg/g dry weight). Moreover, induction of proline aggregation was considerably higher in nitrate nitrogen-treated sensitive line (9.3 mg/g dry weight). The absence of significant difference was obseved between nitrogen treatments in terms of extractable sucrose and root molasses sugar. Also, the root impurities increased in those treated with nitrate-nitrogen and salinity. It can be concluded that nitrate-nitrogen has improved the performance of both sugar beet lines against salinity stress, and its practical application is adviseable.
Read ArticleCOMPARISON OF TWO STAINING METHODS FOR ANODIZING IN ALLOY 6063 ALUMINUM PROFILES
Background: Aluminum stands out for being a light, corrosion-resistant, and recyclable metal, achieving wide coverage in the market. When incorporated into alloying elements, it is possible to acquire other desirable characteristics. Alloy 6063, intended for architectural purposes, has aesthetic, structural, and strength functions. Anodized finishing is performed through an electrolytic process, ensuring a more resistant aluminum oxide film than that formed naturally. For decorative purposes, the anodic film coloration can be performed by several methodologies, in this case, for the coloration by organic adsorption, with the use of aniline, and the electrolytic coloration, composed of tin sulfate salts, both for obtaining the black color. Aim: Compare of two different staining methods on the surface of anodized profiles of aluminum alloy 6063. Methods: Profile samples were collected and tests were carried out to measure the thickness of the anodic layer, immersion tests with 3,5 percent sodium chloride, for 1000 hours, and neutral saline mist, for 600 hours. Results and Discussion: Both methodologies proved to be resistant to immersion tests with sodium chloride, as well as with neutral saline mist, and these tests are quite aggressive and provide corrosion of the material when not well treated. Corrosion points were only seen at the intersections performed, and in the rest of thearea, no points were detected. Conclusions: The result of both methodologies was positive, considering tht there was no corrosion in the tested samples, except in the intersections performed, as well as the maintenance of the color in both tested methodologies, which was not expected in the literature. For future work, it is suggested to deepen the study to perform electrochemical impedance spectroscopy tests for exaluate the strength of the anodic film and perform anodizing with the same parameters, however, with different anilines to analyze their behavior.
Read ArticleREVIEW ABOUT DIABETES MELLITUS AND URINARY TRACT INFECTIONS
Diabetes mellitus (DM) is a clinical disease correlated with a deficiency of insulin secretion or action.It is one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality worldwide. The global burden of diabetes is rising dueto increasing obesity and population aging. Urinary tract infections (UTI) are common microbial infections knownto affect the different parts of the urinary tract accounting for major antibacterial drug consumption. About 150million UTI cases were diagnosed every year. Urinary tract infections are the most important and most commonsite of infections in a diabetic patient. Diabetic patients have been found to have a 5-fold frequency of acutepyelonephritis at autopsy than non-diabetics. Most of the urinary tract infections in patients with diabetes arerelatively asymptomatic. The presence of this syndrome predisposes to much more severe infections,particularly in patients with acute ketoacidosis, poor diabetic control, diabetic complications such as neuropathy,vasculopathy, and nephropathy. The Gram-negative aerobic bacilli are the large group of bacterial pathogensthat cause UTI with few species of Gram-positive bacteria. However, some fungi, parasites, and viruses havealso been reported to invade the urinary tract. Urinary tract infection affects women more than men due toseveral factors such as proximity of the genital tract to the urethra, anatomy of the female urethra, sexualactivity, menopause, and pregnancy. Other possible risk factors of UTI include allergy, obesity, diabetes, pasthistory of UTI, contraceptive use, catheter use, and family history.
Read Article